One penny to report it. Three hundred other people already did.

Penny Spam is a shared blacklist with an extension for Gmail and Outlook. Report an unwanted sender for a penny, and the reports from everyone else decide whether they get filtered. The penny is there so nobody reports for sport.

No account. Tap through the whole thing in about ninety seconds.

8:52

Inbox

$2.0014 reports this month
  • 9out of 100, confirmed offenderfiltered

Your report on its own does nothing.

A score is weighted by how many independent people reported a sender, what evidence came with each report, and whether the behaviour repeats. Reporters who are repeatedly overturned lose weighting. That is the only thing that makes the penny mean anything.

Reports from the same organisation count once. Nine people at one company cannot outvote nine companies.

Dara Whitlock
nashfold.io
12
confirmed offender
Filtering threshold 40
  • Independent reports across 290 organisations42%
  • Repeat sends after an unsubscribe31%
  • Recipients matched to a scraped list18%
  • Reply addresses that do not match the sending domain9%
Your report: 1 of 340. Weight, 0.3%.
A score needs people who have never met each other.

Three senders, three outcomes.

Dara Whitlock
nashfold.io
12out of 100, confirmed offender
340 reports, 290 organisations
  • Eleventh message to you, four after an unsubscribe.
  • Recipients matched to a scraped conference list.
Status: Confirmed, filtered
Tomas Beck
arrowmede.com
58out of 100, borderline
46 reports, 41 organisations
  • Persistent follow-ups, three per contact.
  • Honours unsubscribes. Sends from a verified domain.
Status: Not filtered by default. Filtered under the stricter setting.
Nina Sarr
pellhurst.co.uk
81out of 100, cleared
9 reports, 1 organisation
  • Dropped to 34, then challenged.
  • Restored to 81.
Status: Cleared
OverturnedChallenged and cleared. Nine reports from one organisation, all of whom had opted in at a trade show. Weighting reduced for that reporter.

The middle one is genuinely arguable. We do not filter arguable by default, and you can choose to.

You can see your own score, and you can argue with it.

Any sender can look up their own score for free, without an account.

A challenge is resolved on evidence: opt-in records, unsubscribe handling, sending volume. Not on who complains louder.

When a challenge succeeds, the score is restored, the overturn is logged, and the reporters who got it wrong carry less weight next time.

A blacklist with no appeal is just a grudge with a database.

Sender lookup, no account
arrowmede.com
58 / 100
Borderline
  • Independent reports across 41 organisations48%
  • Follow-ups per contact, three on average37%
  • Unsubscribes honoured within a day-9%
  • Sending domain verified-6%

Nothing is deleted, and nothing happens unless you turn it on.

Off by default
Filtering does nothing until you switch it on. Until then you just see scores.
Two settings
Confirmed offenders only, or the stricter setting that also includes persistent cold outreach.
A folder, not a bin
Filtered messages go to a reviewable folder rather than being removed. Move anything back whenever you like.

Scores are built from behaviour: volume, repetition after an unsubscribe, scraped recipients, spoofed replies. Never from whether the pitch was annoying.

1¢ per report

A penny a report. That is the whole consumer price.

You preload a balance, usually a dollar or two, and each report takes a penny. The penny exists to make a throwaway report cost something, not to make us money. It covers review costs and the remainder funds the challenge process.

The business is selling access to the shared network to companies and email security tools. You are not the product, and neither is your inbox.

Dara Whitlock
nashfold.io
12out of 100, confirmed offender
340 reports across 290 organisations

Eleventh message. Four after an unsubscribe.

Report one and see what happens to it.

Tap through a report, watch the score move by almost nothing, then look at the one that was wrong and got reversed.